In a rare excursion into the facial plastic surgery arena, US News & World Report this week published a pretty darn good story on recent research by Michael P. Ondik, MD, and colleagues at Penn State Hershey Medical Center. Best Option for Fractured Nose Varies by Patient (hat tip to Luxie):
The treatment of nasal fractures is a controversial topic. Some surgeons recommend no intervention, some prefer closed reduction (minimally invasive repair), and others favor extensive open surgery, according to background information in a news release about the study.
"Closed reduction is a relatively simple procedure, at times producing acceptable outcomes. However, advocates of open reduction purport better cosmetic results and a high likelihood that closed reductions will eventually need a second operation sing an open reduction technique," the researchers wrote.
"Deciding which technique to use for a given nasal fracture can be challenging. Not all fractures can be treated using closed techniques and, conversely, not all fractures require the time and expense of an open reduction," the study authors noted.
In this study, Ondik and his team looked at data from 86 patients treated for nasal fractures between 1997 and 2007. Of those, 41 had closed reduction and 45 had open surgery.
"There was no statistical difference in revision rate, patient satisfaction or surgeon photographic evaluation scores between the closed and open treatment groups when fractures were treated in the recommended fashion," the researchers found.
The rest of the news story is here. The Ondik et al study appears in the September/October issue of the journal Archives of Facial Plastic Surgery.